<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ken zirkel &#187; Movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zirkel.com/blog/category/movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zirkel.com/blog</link>
	<description>Gonna drive to the Stop &#039;n&#039; Shop / with the radio on at night</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:05:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Best movie credits</title>
		<link>http://zirkel.com/blog/2009/02/22/best-movie-credits/</link>
		<comments>http://zirkel.com/blog/2009/02/22/best-movie-credits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Zirkel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[As seen on the Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zirkel.com/blog/?p=1239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A year ago I suggested that there should be an academy award for best credit sequence (as well as best trailer). The NY Times today goes a step further and suggests nominees for best credits. It turns out, I&#8217;ve seen four of their five nominees. I like all of them, but I would have to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://zirkel.com/blog/2008/01/22/oscars/">A year ago I suggested</a> that there should be an academy award for best credit sequence (as well as best trailer). The NY Times today goes a step further and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/22/opinion/22movietitles.html">suggests nominees for best credits</a>.</p>
<p>It turns out, I&#8217;ve seen four of their five nominees. I like all of them, but I would have to pick the brilliant concept behind Wall-E as the year&#8217;s best credit sequence. In these credits, we see scenes from the movie depicted in different styles from art history. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zirkel.com/blog/2009/02/22/best-movie-credits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscars</title>
		<link>http://zirkel.com/blog/2008/01/22/oscars/</link>
		<comments>http://zirkel.com/blog/2008/01/22/oscars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Zirkel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zirkel.com/blog/2008/01/22/oscars/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oscar nominations were announced today. I think there should be awards for best film credits, and for best film trailer. Certainly they are creative endeavors worthy of recognition. And they are short enough that more people can see lots of them, and have an opinion. I can imagine, for example, the studios posting their credits [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oscar nominations <a href="http://www.oscars.com/nominees/">were announced today</a>. I think there should be awards for best film credits, and for best film trailer. Certainly they are creative endeavors worthy of recognition. And they are short enough that more people can see lots of them, and have an opinion. I can imagine, for example, the studios posting their credits online for people to view. I know most films lately do away with credits altogether, and I think that&#8217;s a shame. On the other hand, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0467406/">Juno</a> had some pretty spectacular animated credits that really set the mood for the film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zirkel.com/blog/2008/01/22/oscars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We love Godzilla</title>
		<link>http://zirkel.com/blog/2006/05/31/son-loves-godzilla/</link>
		<comments>http://zirkel.com/blog/2006/05/31/son-loves-godzilla/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 20:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Zirkel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Son]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zirkel.com/blog/archives/155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For Memorial Day weekend the SciFi Channel had a Godzilla marathon. I loved Godzilla as a kid, and I wondered if Son was old enough to appreciate the giant lizard. So I tentatively TiVo&#8217;d something called &#8220;Godzilla, Mothra, and King Ghidorah: Giant Monsters All-Out Attack.&#8221; I vaguely remembered a movie in which Godzilla defended Tokyo [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img hspace="9" align="right" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/03/GMK_Poster.jpg/200px-GMK_Poster.jpg" />For Memorial Day weekend the SciFi Channel had a Godzilla marathon. I loved Godzilla as a kid, and I wondered if Son was old enough to appreciate the giant lizard. So I tentatively TiVo&#8217;d something called &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godzilla%2C_Mothra_and_King_Ghidorah:_Giant_Monsters_All-Out_Attack">Godzilla, Mothra, and King Ghidorah: Giant Monsters All-Out Attack</a>.&#8221; I vaguely remembered a movie in which Godzilla defended Tokyo against Mothra, the giant moth, and Ghidora the three-headed monster.</p>
<p>Well, this was not <em>quite</em> that movie. Somehow in this one Godzilla is the evil monster, and Mothra and Ghidora (and some burrowing red monster, Baragon) are the Guardian Monsters. No matter, Son really loved the movie, as did Daughter. They were really excited to see Godzilla emerge from the Sea of Japan and stomp around Tokyo. He asked to see it again.</p>
<p><br clear="all" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zirkel.com/blog/2006/05/31/son-loves-godzilla/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Film: The New World</title>
		<link>http://zirkel.com/blog/2006/02/03/film-the-new-world/</link>
		<comments>http://zirkel.com/blog/2006/02/03/film-the-new-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 02:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Zirkel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zirkel.com/blog/archives/172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading some of the highest praise I&#8217;ve ever read from my favorite film critic Matt Zoller Seitz, I decided to go out and see the film &#8220;The New World.&#8221; I was amazed, impressed, deeply moved. I&#8217;m not quite sure if I agree with Seitz that it is the defining film of our generation, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading some of the highest praise I&#8217;ve ever read from my favorite film critic Matt Zoller Seitz, I decided to go out and see the film &#8220;The New World.&#8221;</p>
<p>I was amazed, impressed, deeply moved. I&#8217;m not quite sure if I agree with Seitz that it is the defining film of our generation, but I wouldn&#8217;t say he&#8217;s wrong, either. If you love film, you will regret it if you don&#8217;t see this movie in the theater. It&#8217;s a big, larger than life story, in which everything stands as a symbol for something larger: civilization vs. wilderness, the nature of self-identity, the beginning of America. It&#8217;s a very deep, elemental, spiritual, moving experience.</p>
<p>Matt Seitz on <a href="http://mattzollerseitz.blogspot.com/2006/01/just-beautiful_25.html">The New World</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://z.about.com/d/movies/1/0/v/o/7/thenewworldposter.jpg" alt="The New World poster" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zirkel.com/blog/2006/02/03/film-the-new-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kill Bill review</title>
		<link>http://zirkel.com/blog/2003/10/11/kill-bill-review/</link>
		<comments>http://zirkel.com/blog/2003/10/11/kill-bill-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2003 16:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Zirkel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zirkel.com/blog/archives/171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, you probably don&#8217;t care, but there are few films I&#8217;ve awaited in the past few years with the anticipation of Kill Bill (vol.1). Despite being unemployed and desperately poor, we hired a sitter and caught opening night at our local megaplex, for about the price of a pair of Broadway tickets (OK, the price [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, you probably don&#8217;t care, but there are few films I&#8217;ve awaited in the past few years with the anticipation of Kill Bill (vol.1). Despite being unemployed and desperately poor, we hired a sitter and caught opening night at our local megaplex, for about the price of a pair of Broadway tickets (OK, the price of one off-broadway ticket).</p>
<p>Despite a few slow parts, the film definitely delivers. All the press you&#8217;ve read (well, that I&#8217;ve read) about Kill Bill is just about right on the money. The film is hyper-violent and hyper-stylized. One might carp that QT should have toned down some of the over-the-top moments, but overall I found in Kill Bill that which I find most satisfying in modern cinema: an original voice.</p>
<p>OK, well, maybe he&#8217;s not that original. As I&#8217;ve read (most notably by my favorite reviewer, Matt Zoller Seitz <http://www.nypress.com/16/41/film/film.cfm> ), QT borrows from many many sources and the film is ultimately a recycling of elements from other films, mostly Hong Kong martial arts films. But you know what? I haven&#8217;t seen any Hong Kong martial arts films (well, maybe a Jackie Chan or two)! So a lot of this stuff is new to me, and probably to most American audiences.</p>
<p>Anyway, what I love about the film &#8212; besides the fact that it looks spectacular and sounds fabulous &#8212; is that every frame comes off as a personal voice. It&#8217;s not a film made by committee, like so many these days (how many times have you read &#8220;they changed this or that because it didn&#8217;t test well&#8221;). Harvey Weinstein gave QT full control over the movie, and it shows. Despite so much of it being borrowed, it&#8217;s all channeled through one guy.</p>
<p>That said, there are some disturbing elements of the film that make me uneasy. I&#8217;m not so keen on seeing beautiful young women scalped or spiked in the head. The film is more concerned with fashion and coolness than making narrative sense. That&#8217;s especially true for the violence, which ranges from funny to &#8220;cool&#8221; but never has &#8220;real&#8221; consequences. It&#8217;s kind of like a shoot-em-up video game.</p>
<p>Still, I was impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://zirkel.com/blog/2003/10/11/kill-bill-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
